CyberdeceptionAtlas · Question → testES

Library / Paper

Paper

Is That Really My X-Ray? Measuring Internet-Exposed DICOM Services in the Presence of Deception

This paper presents a noise-aware measurement study of Internet-facing DICOM services, combining IPv4-wide active scanning with passive honeypot deployments. The authors introduce a reproducible method to filter false positives caused by honeypots, network telescopes, and other measurement artifacts, reducing apparent exposure by 39%. After filtering, they identify thousands of vulnerable deployments lacking encryption and authentication, finding that existing deception systems are insufficient to capture the actual risks.

HoneypotDecoyNetworkApplication

What we know

This paper presents a noise-aware measurement study of Internet-facing DICOM services, combining IPv4-wide active scanning with passive honeypot deployments. The authors introduce a reproducible method to filter false positives caused by honeypots, network telescopes, and other measurement artifacts, reducing apparent exposure by 39%. After filtering, they identify thousands of vulnerable deployments lacking encryption and authentication, finding that existing deception systems are insufficient to capture the actual risks.

Evidence limits

This entry is based solely on the publicly available title and abstract; the full text has not been reviewed nor the findings independently replicated.

Reviewed: author abstract. Full-text results were not analyzed.

Sources and provenance

  1. Is That Really My X-Ray? Measuring Internet-Exposed DICOM Services in the Presence of Deception
    abstract · 2026-10-04

Reviewed: 2026-10-04. This record may change when new evidence is found.

RIS · BibTeX