Open data · v2026.10.4

Downloads and citation

Export public catalog records and bibliography. Private submissions and editorial changes are excluded.

Complete catalog · JSON · v2026.10.4Snapshot of 770 records; consolidates provenance labels without adding records.Complete package · ZIPCatalog, sources, relationships, manifest and checksums in one archiveCSV770 spreadsheet rows; nested metadata retained as JSON columnsJSONLOne complete record per lineSources · JSONReferences and record provenanceRelationships · JSONDocumented links between resourcesRelease manifestCounts, license, provenance and file checksumsPackage guideFormats, license and release scopeFile verification · SHA-256Checksums for catalog formats, sources, relationships and manifestZIP verification · SHA-256External checksum of the complete archiveEarlier research package · v2026.10Earlier 190-record corpus, protocol, analysis and pilotSHA-256Independent package checksumCodebookVariables, inference rules and boundariesCorpus analysisDescriptive results and sensitivity viewsPilot observations160 CSV observationsLive export · JSONPublic records with source, evidence and licenseLive export · CSVFor spreadsheet analysisBibTeXPaper bibliographyPDF · EspañolInitial state-of-field report

Earlier manuscript draft · v2026.09.2

Federico Pacheco and Diego Staino, Cyberdeception Atlas: A Source-Bounded Evidence Map and Reporting Framework, v2026.09.2 (2026).

Archived draft predating the current registry manuscript and RSAC 2027 proposal. It was not submitted or peer reviewed. It remains available as a record of that project stage; the catalog version offered above is v2026.10.4.

Also available in Spanish. No DOI has been assigned yet.

How to cite the corpus

Federico Pacheco and Diego Staino, Cyberdeception Atlas: resource catalog, version v2026.10.4, 2026. cyberdeceptionatlas.org.

Original Atlas data and documents are released under CC BY 4.0; software is under MIT. Linked sources retain their own rights. A DOI has not yet been assigned.

Coverage is initial and grows through editorial review. Publication metadata is not equivalent to a full-text review.