CyberdeceptionAtlas · Question → testES

Library / Paper

Paper

Honeyquest for LLMs: Rethinking Cyber Deception for AI Attackers

This paper adapts the Honeyquest instrument to automatically evaluate LLM-based attacker judgment against cyber deception techniques. According to the authors, a cohort of 21 models from various providers was compared against a human baseline on reconnaissance tasks, finding that LLMs fall for traps at higher rates than humans and show a gap between recognizing deception in their reasoning and acting accordingly. The authors conclude that human-centered deception hypotheses do not reliably transfer to AI attackers.

HoneypotDecoyAdversary engagementNetwork

What we know

This paper adapts the Honeyquest instrument to automatically evaluate LLM-based attacker judgment against cyber deception techniques. According to the authors, a cohort of 21 models from various providers was compared against a human baseline on reconnaissance tasks, finding that LLMs fall for traps at higher rates than humans and show a gap between recognizing deception in their reasoning and acting accordingly. The authors conclude that human-centered deception hypotheses do not reliably transfer to AI attackers.

Evidence limits

This entry is based solely on the available title and abstract; the full text has not been reviewed and the reported effectiveness has not been independently validated.

Reviewed: author abstract. Full-text results were not analyzed.

Sources and provenance

  1. Honeyquest for LLMs: Rethinking Cyber Deception for AI Attackers
    abstract · 2026-10-04

Reviewed: 2026-10-04. This record may change when new evidence is found.

RIS · BibTeX