What we know
This study examines how different probing costs affect adversarial decision-making in a deception game, using an IBLT model with delayed feedback to simulate human behavior. According to the authors, probing slightly decreased as its cost increased, while the proportion of attacks remained relatively stable. The authors conclude that different probing costs do not significantly affect the proportion of attacks but have a slight impact on the proportion of probing.
Evidence limits
This entry is based solely on the publicly available title and abstract; the full text has not been reviewed and the method's effectiveness has not been independently validated.
Reviewed: author abstract. Full-text results were not analyzed.
Sources and provenance
- Assessing the Influence of Different Types of Probing on Adversarial Decision-Making in a Deception Game
abstract · 2026-10-04
Reviewed: 2026-10-04. This record may change when new evidence is found.